Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Sony Xperia XZ3, getting a global score of 92.9 against 79.6. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ3. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Sony Xperia XZ3 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger camera aperture, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with greater battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.