Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-17 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M33 has a general score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Xperia XZ3's general score of 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy M33 body is just a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Xperia XZ3. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M33 has older 12 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Sony Xperia XZ3 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 19 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy M33 has a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.