Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2018-10-17 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ3's general score of 79.6. The Galaxy S10e is a a lot lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Sony Xperia XZ3, although both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Xperia XZ3 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a little bit better pixels number per display inch and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit faster processing unit than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xperia XZ3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images in low-light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xperia XZ3 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.