Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Xperia XZ3's overall score of 79.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer device, and it's also a lot thinner and a little lighter than the Xperia XZ3. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZ3 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Xperia XZ3 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with a way better 19 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with more storage for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Xperia XZ3, although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just 3300mAh of battery size against 3330mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.