Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-04-05 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is a bit better than Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. The LG V30 is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than Xperia XZs, even when they were released with only a few months difference. The LG V30 features a bit better processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG V30 also has a larger number of faster cores.
LG V30 counts with a little sharper display than Xperia XZs, because it has a bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xperia XZs has a greater camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with faster video frame rate, a camera with more MP and a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The LG V30 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 counts with a little longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V30 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.