Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 score. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is much newer than Xperia XZs, it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a greater pixel density and a larger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more processing cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xperia XZs features a greater camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.