Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 77.2 score against 76.4. The Xperia XZs is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 4 CPU cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Xperia XZs counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Xperia XZs also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xperia XZs features a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video definition, they both have the same aperture. Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZs, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.