Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a bit better than Xperia XZs's overall score of 77.2. The Motorola DROID Turbo is an a lot older, a bit heavier and noticeably thicker phone than Xperia XZs. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better looking display than Xperia XZs, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Sony Xperia XZs features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a GPU.
The Xperia XZs shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a worse 19 MP resolution camera, they both have a F2 diafragm aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 34 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.