Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is a lot newer than Sony Xperia XZs, it is way heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has more cores.
The Sony Xperia XZs features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZs takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and a lot less MP camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.