Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is better than Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a heavier device than the Xperia XZs, but they are 0.32inches thick. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a display that is just as good as Xperia XZs's display, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a bit lower pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy A71 5G features a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Sony Xperia XZs features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a much smaller back camera sensor capturing way worse quality images and videos, a tinier camera aperture, a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A71 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.