Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. The Galaxy A90 5G body is way newer than Sony Xperia XZs's, but it is just a little bit thicker and way heavier. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a display that's very similar to Xperia XZs's screen, because although the Galaxy A90 5G has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM.
Sony Xperia XZs captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, they both have a F2 camera aperture. Galaxy A90 5G has a way better battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.