Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZs, getting an 83.3 score against 77.2. Galaxy M30s's construction is extremely newer than the Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy M30s features a little faster processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy M30s also has a greater number of cores.
The Sony Xperia XZs and the Galaxy M30s have similar screens, because although the Galaxy M30s has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Xperia XZs takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a much worse 19 mega pixels resolution and a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, they both have a F2 diafragm aperture.
Galaxy M30s counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.