Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is much better than the Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. Samsung Galaxy M31s's body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than Xperia XZs. Galaxy M31s counts with a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZs and Galaxy M31s both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy M31s has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display. Xperia XZs shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M31s, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back camera with a much worse 19 MP resolution, a lot smaller camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality and a smaller camera aperture.
Galaxy M31s counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy M31s has a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 107 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.