Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZs, getting a 77.8 score against 77.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is newer and extremely thinner, but also a lot heavier than Sony Xperia XZs. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a way larger screen and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Sony Xperia XZs features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cores and less RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's camera is just as good as Sony Xperia XZs's camera, although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a much larger back camera sensor and a way higher video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xperia XZs, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia XZs. If you want to save some money, you can buy Xperia XZs, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.