Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than Xperia XZs, with a 78.8 score against 77.2. Vivo X60 Pro's design is noticeably newer and a little thinner than the Xperia XZs's, although it is also a little bit heavier. Vivo X60 Pro features a greater performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a larger display. Sony Xperia XZs has a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a tinier back camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos and a camera in the back with way less MP resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.