Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Xperia XZs, with a global score of 85.5 against 77.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is newer than Xperia XZs's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2246px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Xperia XZs captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, a much better resolution camera and faster 960 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.