Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-06-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 7.06 x 3.63 x 0.26 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 870 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Xperia Z Ultra, with a general score of 81.3 against 68.8. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and extremely lighter phone than the Xperia Z Ultra, although it is also thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Sony Xperia Z Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot better pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Xperia Z Ultra, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better camera than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality and a lot better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better battery life than Sony Xperia Z Ultra, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.