Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 5.1 |
| 2013-06-25 | 2015-10-27 |
| 7.06 x 3.63 x 0.26 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.6 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 870 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is just a bit better than the Xperia Z Ultra, with a 74.8 score against 68.8. Motorola DROID Turbo 2's design is much newer and extremely lighter, but also much thicker than Xperia Z Ultra. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has the newer 5.1 version while Xperia Z Ultra has Android 4.4 version.
The Xperia Z Ultra features a bit superior processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a greater number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a sharper display than Xperia Z Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots way better pictures and videos than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features longer battery performance than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.