Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-06-25 | 2019-12-27 |
| 7.06 x 3.63 x 0.26 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 870 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Xperia Z Ultra, with a global score of 85.5 against 68.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Xperia Z Ultra has Android 4.4 version, so it provides a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A51 is a extremely newer and somewhat lighter device than the Xperia Z Ultra, although it is also somewhat thicker.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better CPU than Xperia Z Ultra, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xperia Z Ultra has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen.
Galaxy A51 captures way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z Ultra, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has a 31 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy A51 costs a bit more money than Xperia Z Ultra, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.