Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-06-25 | 2020-02-03 |
| 7.06 x 3.63 x 0.26 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 344 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 870 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than Xperia Z Ultra, getting a global score of 89.7 against 68.8. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design is noticeably newer and somewhat lighter than Xperia Z Ultra's, but it's somewhat thicker. Sony Xperia Z Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little lower pixel density and a little smaller screen.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia Z Ultra, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Sony Xperia Z Ultra, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery lifetime than Xperia Z Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit more expensive than the Xperia Z Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.