Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Sony Xperia Z2, with a score of 77.8 against 72.9. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than the Sony Xperia Z2, it's thinner and also extremely newer. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version while Sony Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Xperia Z2, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Sony Xperia Z2 has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Xperia Z2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Sony Xperia Z2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Sony Xperia Z2. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Sony Xperia Z2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.