Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Xperia Z2a, getting an 82.9 score against 73. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version. The Google Pixel 4a design is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Xperia Z2a.
Xperia Z2a counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little lower pixels count in each inch of display. Google Pixel 4a has a superior memory to install applications and games than Xperia Z2a, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4a has a processing unit that is very similar to Xperia Z2a's processing unit, because although the Google Pixel 4a has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit better camera than Xperia Z2a, although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, a lower video quality and a much less mega pixels camera.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has a 3140mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 4a is a lot more expensive than the Xperia Z2a, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.