Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is slightly better than Xperia Z2a, with a score of 77.9 against 73. These phones have Android OS, but the LG Q70 has 10 version while Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version. The LG Q70 construction is somewhat heavier but much thinner than the Xperia Z2a. The Sony Xperia Z2a has a better display than LG Q70, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density.
LG Q70 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Sony Xperia Z2a features just a bit better processing power than LG Q70, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The LG Q70 features a much better camera than Xperia Z2a, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG Q70 counts with longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
LG Q70 costs a lot more money than the Xperia Z2a, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.