Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has an overall score of 76.4, which is slightly better than Xperia Z2a's 73 overall score. Nokia 9 PureView is a just a little heavier but much thinner device than Xperia Z2a. The Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia Z2a features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a just a little lower pixels number in each inch of screen and a quite smaller screen. Nokia 9 PureView features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better battery duration than Xperia Z2a, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity. Nokia 9 PureView shoots slightly better photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z2a, although it has a camera with way less megapixels resolution, a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is way more expensive than Sony Xperia Z2a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Sony Xperia Z2a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Sony Xperia Z2a, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.