Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 is a little bit better than the Xperia Z2a, with a 76.1 score against 73. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has the previous 12 version and Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy A22 design is way thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xperia Z2a.
The Xperia Z2a features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot greater pixels density. The Xperia Z2a features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A22 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy A22 features a superior storage for apps and games than Xperia Z2a, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Xperia Z2a has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.