Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Sony Xperia Z2a, having a overall score of 80.1 against 73. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Sony Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2, so it gives a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is thicker and way heavier than the Sony Xperia Z2a.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. The Xperia Z2a has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a bit lower screen density and a little bit smaller display.
The Xperia Z2a features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way better 20.7 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a much higher (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z2a, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery duration than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Sony Xperia Z2a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Sony Xperia Z2a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Sony Xperia Z2a, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.