Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the Sony Xperia Z2a, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 73. Galaxy Z Flip's body is extremely thinner but heavier than the Sony Xperia Z2a. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Sony Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). Xperia Z2a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit longer battery life than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Xperia Z2a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a smaller back camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xperia Z2a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z2a. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Xperia Z2a, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.