Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Xperia Z2a, getting a global score of 92.3 against 73. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a heavier but noticeably thinner phone than Xperia Z2a. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Xperia Z2a has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better display density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processor than Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Xperia Z2a, although it has a lower video definition, a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage for applications and games than Xperia Z2a, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better battery life than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Sony Xperia Z2a, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.