Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than the Xperia Z2a, with an 81.6 score against 73. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a incredibly heavier but thinner cellphone than the Xperia Z2a. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version while Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little better hardware performance than Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of 2300 MHz cores and more RAM. The Xperia Z2a features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures a lot better photographs and videos than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia Z2a, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery duration than Xperia Z2a, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.