Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than the Xperia Z2a's overall score of 73. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner but a lot heavier than Xperia Z2a. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xperia Z2a features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better camera than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xperia Z2a, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery life than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more than the Xperia Z2a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.