Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a little bit better than Xperia Z3+, having a general score of 77 against 73.7. Although the LG V20 is newer than Xperia Z3+, it is just a little thicker and heavier. The LG V20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia Z3+ features a bit more vivid display than LG V20, although it has a just a little worse screen density, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit smaller screen. The LG V20 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia Z3+, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xperia Z3+ has just a bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a lot higher 20.7 mega-pixels resolution camera.
LG V20 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 9% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V20 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.