Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Aurora black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than Xperia Z3+, having an 83.7 score against 73.7. The LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone than the Xperia Z3+, although it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version.
Sony Xperia Z3+ counts with a slightly better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display and a little smaller screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2930mAh. The Xperia Z3+ has a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more money than the Xperia Z3+, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.