Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android |
| 2015-05-26 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass; metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than the Xperia Z3+, having an 84.7 score against 73.7. The Galaxy A32 construction is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than Xperia Z3+. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and Xperia Z3+ comes with Android 5.0 operating system.
The Xperia Z3+ has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Galaxy A32 counts with much more storage for apps and games than Xperia Z3+, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A32 has a little faster processing unit than Xperia Z3+, because it has 7 more processing cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better camera than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A32 has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a 71% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.