Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is noticeably heavier than the Sony Xperia Z3+, it's thinner and also way newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better display than Xperia Z3+, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z3+, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Xperia Z3+ features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Xperia Z3+, because it has a much larger sensor, a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2930mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z3+. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Xperia Z3+, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.