Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Xperia Z4v's score of 78.8. Google Pixel 2 is a notably newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xperia Z4v. Xperia Z4v features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Xperia Z4v features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 2 has a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.