Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 general score. LG V50 ThinQ is a extremely newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Xperia Z4v, although it is also heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a better display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xperia Z4v has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a way smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.