Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia Z4v, having a global score of 81.2 against 78.8. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, so it provides some extra features. Motorola Edge 50's design is newer and a little bit thinner than Sony Xperia Z4v's, but it's also heavier.
Xperia Z4v has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Xperia Z4v has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a slightly better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 captures much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much better resolution camera, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better memory for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.