Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 overall score. The Galaxy A32 is a notably newer cellphone than Xperia Z4v, although it is way heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Xperia Z4v works with Android 5.1 OS.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A32 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xperia Z4v counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a GPU. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and video and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.