Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Xperia Z4v's overall score of 78.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is heavier than Xperia Z4v, it's thinner and newer. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Xperia Z4v has a much sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much greater pixel number per inch of display.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro has longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.