Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 78.8 against 77.8. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Sony Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Sony Xperia Z4v design is a lot lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a GPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has a way lower display density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Xperia Z4v, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger sensor, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and a lot better resolution back-facing camera. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xperia Z4v is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.