Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 425.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact's overall score of 75.1. Although LG V50 ThinQ is heavier than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, it's just a bit thinner and also notably newer. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version and Sony Xperia Z5 Compact has Android 5.1 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a lot higher pixel density, a way bigger display and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Xperia Z5 Compact, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xperia Z5 Compact has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia Z5 Compact also counts with a lot better 23 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.