Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 545.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium is an extremely older and thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony was able to make it lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has 5.1 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a higher 3840 x 2160px resolution. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations, a way better video resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 66 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xperia Z5 Premium is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.