Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android |
| 2015-09-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 409.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xperia Z5's score of 77.6. Galaxy A32's body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than the Xperia Z5. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Xperia Z5 works with Android 5.1 operating system.
The Xperia Z5 has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot more pixels per screen inch. Xperia Z5 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Xperia Z5 also counts with an additional GPU.
The Galaxy A32 takes clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.