Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 409.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Xperia Z5, with a overall score of 77.8 against 77.6. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than the Xperia Z5, it's thinner and also much newer. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Xperia Z5 has Android 5.1.
The Sony Xperia Z5 has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z5 also counts with a GPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a really larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has a larger aperture, a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a lot better video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia Z5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xperia Z5. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xperia Z5, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.