Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.96 x 2.56 x 0.42 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1820mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than T-Mobile Concord II, having a general score of 80 against 47.4. The Google Pixel 3 design is heavier but extremely thinner than T-Mobile Concord II. Google Pixel 3 features a better performance than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has 6 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid display than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution, a really larger screen and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 3 has a much better camera than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than T-Mobile Concord II, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 60 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a much longer battery life than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 costs a little more than T-Mobile Concord II, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.