Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 4.96 x 2.56 x 0.42 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1820mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is much better than the T-Mobile Concord II's score of 47.4. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has the newer 10 version while T-Mobile Concord II has Android 4.3 version, so it counts with some additional features and better performance. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a just a little thinner but much heavier cellphone than T-Mobile Concord II.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a more vivid screen than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a much larger display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a better performing processing unit than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Xiaomi Poco M3 features a lot better camera than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a much higher (Full HD) video quality.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a superior battery lifetime than T-Mobile Concord II, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the T-Mobile Concord II, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.