Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.38 x 2.95 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 252.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P23 MT6763T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus's 60.5 overall score. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus were released only 6 months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a little bit thinner but also just a little heavier than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery lifetime is very similar to T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus's battery lifetime.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.