Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a lot better than the T-Mobile Revvlry's 62.1 global score. Although Google Pixel 2 is older than T-Mobile Revvlry, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than T-Mobile Revvlry, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 features a brighter screen than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 2 takes clearer photos and videos than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a worse video quality and a worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The T-Mobile Revvlry features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper than the T-Mobile Revvlry.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.