Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.00 x 2.42 x 0.60 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.70 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.5 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 456 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is much better than the T-Mobile Sidekick 4G's 44.2 score. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and T-Mobile Sidekick 4G has Android 2.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a better processing power than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G, because it has a better graphics processing unit working at 400 megahertz, a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a little more vivid screen than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G, because it has a lot bigger screen, a way higher 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Galaxy S III Cricket captures much clearer photographs and videos than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G, because it has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 1920x1080 video quality. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 64 GB.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better battery performance than T-Mobile Sidekick 4G, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket and the T-Mobile Sidekick 4G cost exactly the same, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.