Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.1 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.65 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.5 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
T-Mobile Sparq II has a general score of 31.1, which is much better than the Cricket CAPTR's 27.9 overall score. The T-Mobile Sparq II is a way heavier but thinner cellphone than Cricket CAPTR. The T-Mobile Sparq II features a bit better looking display than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a greater display density, a really larger screen and a way higher 320 x 240 resolution.
Cricket CAPTR's processor is very similar to the processing unit in T-Mobile Sparq II, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The T-Mobile Sparq II has a much better camera than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera. T-Mobile Sparq II has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 32 GB.
Cricket CAPTR counts with a very superior battery duration than T-Mobile Sparq II.
The T-Mobile Sparq II and the Cricket CAPTR cost exactly the same, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.